Well in our industry it's that the movies cost so much money to make they have to appeal to a broad audience. And I think that's part of what will loosen up in the future as technology makes it cheaper you'll be able to make films for a more selective audience. I think people will be able to make more personal movies.

The world changes materially. Science makes advances in technology and understanding. But the world of humanity doesn't change.

It's hard to say exactly what it is about face-to-face contact that makes deals happen but whatever it is it hasn't yet been duplicated by technology.

When you look at other countries that are developing the capabilities and the technology to deploy missiles of very significant destructive capability with nuclear chemical or biological warheads then the MAD dogma makes even less sense.

Technology is a wonderful tool but also if used incorrectly a horrible tool. We're fascinated by all aspects of it whatever makes our human lives easier on the planet but eventually there will have to be some sort of merger. The fascination isn't going to die down.

I'm in favor of any technology that makes my work available to the reading public at a reasonable price.

What makes the production of my work so expensive? The whole installation thing - the construction the objects the technology. It really adds up.

There's a lot more to see when you're playing and because of the advances in technology it makes room for all kinds of new characters.

Technology feeds on itself. Technology makes more technology possible.

I'm equally guilty of using technology - I Twitter I text people I chat. But I think there's something strangely insidious about it that it makes us think we're closer when in fact we're not seeing each other we're not connecting.