Freedom is hammered out on the anvil of discussion dissent and debate.

The public character of every public servant is legitimate subject of discussion and his fitness or unfitness for office may be fairly canvassed by any person.

Should we fear hackers? Intention is at the heart of this discussion.

I never discuss a novel while I'm writing it for fear that talking about it will diminish my desire to write it.

I get 0.5 seconds to react to a ball sometimes even less than that. I can't be thinking of what XYZ has said about me. I need to surrender myself to my natural instincts. My subconscious mind knows exactly what to do. It is trained to react. At home my family doesn't discuss media coverage.

I grew up in a family in which political issues were often discussed and debated intensely.

I do not purpose to discuss faith in its dogmatic sense today.

I find that it's hard to fully examine one's life and not have faith be part of the discussion.

Our country's political discourse and debate are enriched by discussions of the political implications of our faith traditions whether they are taking place in our communities at our dinner tables or in our places of worship.

For my future I have no concern and as a true philosopher I never would have any for I know not what it may be: as a Christian on the other hand faith must believe without discussion and the stronger it is the more it keeps silent.