For centuries we have been living in the society where not laws but people ruled where there was no legal state.

I have a book coming out in September for example where the plot concerns counterfeiting and I had to do a lot of research on that. Or on any legal matters for example I have to do a lot of research online.

I'm not a lawyer and maybe I should have used more specific legal language.

I object to a legal approach when settling questions of science or scientific behavior.

Companies shouldn't use the law to prevent consumers from doing something legal.

I hope gay marriage will be legal in every state.

People talk of me as being the inventor of the legal thriller.

Drones can be a highly effective way of dealing with high-priority targets but they should not become the drug of choice for an administration that is afraid to use successful legal and safe tactics of the past.

We knew that if the photos of CIA officers conducting authorized EIT (enhanced interrogation techniques) ever got out the difference between a legal authorized necessary and safe program and the mindless actions of some MPs (military police) would be buried by the impact of the images.

In my book I detail the critical information we obtained from al Qaeda terrorists after they became compliant following a short period of enhanced interrogation. I have no doubt that that interrogation was legal necessary and saved lives.