Fruitful discourse in science or theology requires us to believe that within the contexts of normal discourse there are some true statements.

Rationalism and Newtonian science has lured us into dark woods but a new metaphysics can rescue us.

We didn't set out to be educators or even scientists and we don't purport that what we do is real science but we're demonstrating a methodology by which one can engage and satisfy your curiosity.

That's the show. it's like 5 minutes of science and then 10 minutes of me hurting myself.

In the spirit of science there really is no such thing as a 'failed experiment.' Any test that yields valid data is a valid test.

Like many students I found the drudgery of real experiments and the slowness of progress a complete shock and at my low points I contemplated other alternative careers including study of the philosophy or sociology of science.

I think it was this curiosity about the natural world which awoke my early interest in science.

I have an idealistic view of science as a liberalising and progressive force for humanity.

I felt strongly that since the pursuit of good science was so difficult it was essential that the problem being studied was an important one to justify the effort expanded.

Science is always inquiring.