The argument for intelligent design basically depends on saying 'You haven't answered every question with evolution '... Well guess what? Science can't answer every question.

The scientific argument advanced for intelligent design at the Dover trial those arguments collapsed scientifically and intellectually.

Different people have different styles but there is an opportunity as a director to be a writer in every moment with every visual cue and every piece of production design. Everything is a decision and everything can be obsessed over.

Every step and every movement of the multitude even in what are termed enlightened ages are made with equal blindness to the future and nations stumble upon establishments which are indeed the result of human action but not the execution of any human design.

It is not possible to design always the same. How to be different in each different place - that is the most important work and duty of the architect to find out.

When you design it think how you would feel if you had to fly it! Safety first!

Design can change how you look at yourself.

Being non-commercial is never an ambition. Movies come together at different points for fortuitous reasons. You do them as you get the opportunity as opposed to doing them when you choose to or design to.

The interesting thing is when we design and architect a server we don't design it for Windows or Linux we design it for both. We don't really care as long as we're selling the one the customer wants.

Intelligent design itself does not have any content.