I won't predict anything historic. But nothing is impossible.

It is impossible in our condition of Society not to be sometimes a Snob.

We sometimes laugh from ear to ear but it would be impossible for a smile to be wider than the distance between our eyes.

It is impossible to persuade a man who does not disagree but smiles.

It is characteristic of science that the full explanations are often seized in their essence by the percipient scientist long in advance of any possible proof.

If you look at the purported dangers of salt or fat there is no consensus of support in scientific literature. So I would ask first: 'Is it possible to have an informed government that actually follows the science?' From what I've seen it's not likely.

The assumption that nature is all there is and that nature has been governed by the same rules at all times and places makes it possible for natural science to be confident that it can explain such things as how life began.

Science has always been my preoccupation and when you think a breakthrough is possible it is terribly exciting.

Science has everything to say about what is possible. Science has nothing to say about what is permissible.

Don't confuse hypothesis and theory. The former is a possible explanation the latter the correct one. The establishment of theory is the very purpose of science.